[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1361929234.1924.8.camel@joe-AO722>
Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2013 17:40:34 -0800
From: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>
Cc: Peter Korsgaard <jacmet@...site.dk>,
Nicolas Pitre <nico@...xnic.net>,
"Markus F.X.J. Oberhumer" <markus@...rhumer.com>,
Kyungsik Lee <kyungsik.lee@....com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Michal Marek <mmarek@...e.cz>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org,
celinux-dev@...ts.celinuxforum.org,
Nitin Gupta <nitingupta910@...il.com>,
Richard Purdie <rpurdie@...nedhand.com>,
Josh Triplett <josh@...htriplett.org>,
Joe Millenbach <jmillenbach@...il.com>,
David Sterba <dsterba@...e.cz>,
Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com>,
Albin Tonnerre <albin.tonnerre@...e-electrons.com>,
Egon Alter <egon.alter@....net>, hyojun.im@....com,
chan.jeong@....com, raphael.andy.lee@...il.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 0/4] Add support for LZ4-compressed kernel
On Tue, 2013-02-26 at 22:10 +0000, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> So... for a selected kernel version of a particular size, can we please
> have a comparison between the new LZO code and this LZ4 code, so that
> we can see whether it's worth updating the LZO code or replacing the
> LZO code with LZ4?
How could it be questionable that it's worth updating the LZO code?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists