[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <512D93D5.3010501@ti.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2013 10:34:21 +0530
From: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@...com>
To: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
CC: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
<john.stultz@...aro.org>, <tglx@...utronix.de>,
<jacob.jun.pan@...ux.intel.com>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org>,
<patches@...aro.org>, <linus.walleij@...ricsson.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] ARM: timer-sp: Set dynamic irq affinity
On Wednesday 27 February 2013 10:29 AM, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 27 February 2013 10:26, Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@...com> wrote:
>> On Wednesday 27 February 2013 03:47 AM, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
>>>
>>> From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
>>>
>>> When a cpu goes to a deep idle state where its local timer is shutdown, it
>>> notifies the time frame work to use the broadcast timer instead.
>>>
>>> Unfortunately, the broadcast device could wake up any CPU, including an
>>> idle one
>>> which is not concerned by the wake up at all.
>>>
>> Broad-cast device will only open the CPU for which the timer IRQ
>> affined to. And infact with subject series the affinity also is
>> updated for the CPU which owns the last timer expiry event.
>>
>> What am I missing here ?
>
> Dynamic affinity will work only if the following flag is set for a
> clock_event_device: CLOCK_EVT_FEAT_DYNIRQ, otherwise wakeup
> would happen on the cpu to which static affinity was set to.
>
I should have looked at the patches in order first :)
Sorry for the noise.
Regards,
Santosh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists