linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] slub: correctly bootstrap boot caches

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAOJsxLFzrw0pCzUG7Ru4dB9=aPoNKHiJ_y3bopiFvBhzV9A5Zg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Wed, 27 Feb 2013 09:47:37 +0200
From:	Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>
To:	Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>
Cc:	Glauber Costa <glommer@...allels.com>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, cgroups@...r.kernel.org,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, Joonsoo Kim <js1304@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] slub: correctly bootstrap boot caches

On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 7:23 PM, Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com> wrote:
> On Fri, 22 Feb 2013, Glauber Costa wrote:
>
>> On 02/22/2013 09:01 PM, Christoph Lameter wrote:
>> > Argh. This one was the final version:
>> >
>> > https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/2009521/
>> >
>>
>> It seems it would work. It is all the same to me.
>> Which one do you prefer?
>
> Flushing seems to be simpler and less code.

Well, I completely lost track of what to apply... Can someone please
send me the final version that everybody agrees on with proper ACKs
and other attributions?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/