linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/4] time: dynamic irq affinity

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20130227104701.GZ17833@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
Date:	Wed, 27 Feb 2013 10:47:01 +0000
From:	Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>
To:	Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@...com>
Cc:	Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>, john.stultz@...aro.org,
	tglx@...utronix.de, viresh.kumar@...aro.org,
	jacob.jun.pan@...ux.intel.com,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org,
	patches@...aro.org, linus.walleij@...ricsson.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] time: dynamic irq affinity

On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 11:30:11AM +0530, Santosh Shilimkar wrote:
> P.S: Time and again it proves that making the local timer wakeup
> capable solves the issue.

Slightly different take: it proves that hardware people don't talk to
software people about what they require to make an operating system
work.  Hardware people think they understand that and go off and do
their own thing, and expect software people to sort out their mess.

This happens all the time; there is no solution for it as long as
companies view the creation of hardware as being entirely separate
from software.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/