[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <512E2241.9040705@mimc.co.uk>
Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2013 15:12:01 +0000
From: Mark Jackson <mpfj-list@...c.co.uk>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
CC: linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: linux-next: JFFS2 corruption
On 26/02/13 23:18, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Mark,
>
> On Tue, 26 Feb 2013 15:50:18 +0000 Mark Jackson <mpfj-list@...c.co.uk> wrote:
>>
>> Just tested the current next-20130226 on a custom AM335X board, and if I mount
>> our JFFS2 image as read/write, the next reboot shows the image as being corrupt.
>>
>> If I reprogram the jffs2 image into NAND and only mount the volume as read-only,
>> no corruption occurs and the system remains intact.
>>
>> I have also tested:-
>>
>> (a) reprogram ubifs image into nand
>> (b) boot the volume as read-only (corrupt -> no)
>> (c) remount the volume as read/write
>> (d) rebooting the volume as read-only (corrupt -> yes)
>
> Thanks for all the testing. Sam questions as in my other email.
Okay, just tested 3v8 plus:-
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/1931251/
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/1931221/
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/1931201/
and changed drivers/mtd/nand/elm.c, line 388 "ti,am33xx-elm" to "ti,am3352-elm"
This produces an identical corruption.
I have also tested next-20130225 and next-20130227, and both cause the same corruption.
Regards
Mark J.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists