[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130227152949.GD22383@htj.dyndns.org>
Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2013 07:29:49 -0800
From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
Cc: rjw@...k.pl, cpufreq@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org,
robin.randhawa@....com, Steve.Bannister@....com,
Liviu.Dudau@....com, charles.garcia-tobin@....com,
rickard.andersson@...ricsson.com, fabio.baltieri@...aro.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] workqueue: define mod_scheduled_delayed_work[_on]()
helpers
Hello, Viresh.
On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 08:44:52PM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> To keep things aligned probably i should replace schedule_work() with
> queue_work() and use system_wq there too..
Yeah, that probably is more preferable. There are codes like the
following in kernel and they always irk me.
if (custom_wq)
queue_work();
else
schedule_work();
It's just silly.
Thanks.
--
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists