[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130227154002.GE24932@phenom.dumpdata.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2013 10:40:02 -0500
From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>
To: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@...e.com>
Cc: Chen Gang <gang.chen@...anux.com>, roger.pau@...rix.com,
stefano.stabellini@...citrix.com,
xen-devel <xen-devel@...ts.xen.org>, dgdegra@...ho.nsa.gov,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drivers/block/xen-blkback: preq.dev is used without
initialized
On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 10:45:35AM +0000, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>> On 27.02.13 at 11:38, Chen Gang <gang.chen@...anux.com> wrote:
> > 于 2013年02月27日 17:57, Jan Beulich 写道:
> >> You also could have mentioned that even before commit
> >> 01c681d4c70d64cb72142a2823f27c4146a02e63 the value printed
> >> here was bogus, as it was the guest provided value from
> >> req->u.rw.handle rather than the actual device.
> >
> > pardon ?
> >
> > I guess what you said is :
> > my patch seems ok, but the comments need improving.
> > need add "additional info" in comments:
> > "before commit 01c681d4c70d64cb72142a2823f27c4146a02e63
> > the value printed here was bogus, as it was the guest
> > provided value from req->u.rw.handle rather than the
> > actual device".
> >
> > is it correct ?
>
> Yes (and you might have missed the ACK that I had already sent
> before this reply - that mail got bounced for your address).
Yup. Chen, could you respin the patch with the extra comment and
the Ack from Jan please?
Thank you!
>
> Jan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists