[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <512E2F98.6070404@epfl.ch>
Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2013 17:08:56 +0100
From: Florian Vaussard <florian.vaussard@...l.ch>
To: Bryan Wu <cooloney@...il.com>
CC: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...onic-design.de>,
Richard Purdie <rpurdie@...ys.net>,
Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@...com>,
linux-leds@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/3] leds: leds-pwm: Defer led_pwm_set() if PWM can
sleep
Hi Bryan,
On 01/30/2013 09:17 AM, Thierry Reding wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 03:00:59PM +0100, Florian Vaussard wrote:
>> Call to led_pwm_set() can happen inside atomic context, like triggers.
>> If the PWM call can sleep, defer using a worker.
>>
>> Cc: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@...com>
>> Signed-off-by: Florian Vaussard <florian.vaussard@...l.ch>
>> ---
>> drivers/leds/leds-pwm.c | 50 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
>> 1 files changed, 42 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> Bryan, I assume that you'll be taking this? It doesn't apply cleanly to
> my tree, probably because of Peter's recent changes that you took
> through your tree and Florian based his patches on top of that. The
> conflict resolution should be trivial, though.
>
It seems that this patch was not taken. Could you pull it, as the other
part is already in linux-pwm? Or is there any show stopper?
Many thanks.
Florian
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists