[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130227183850.GA6042@redhat.com>
Date:	Wed, 27 Feb 2013 19:38:50 +0100
From:	Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
To:	Andrey Vagin <avagin@...nvz.org>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, criu@...nvz.org,
	linux-api@...r.kernel.org, Roland McGrath <roland@...hat.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
	Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>,
	"Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)" <mtk.manpages@...il.com>,
	Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@...allels.com>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Pedro Alves <palves@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] ptrace: add ability to retrieve signals without
	removing from a queue (v3)
On 02/27, Andrey Vagin wrote:
>
> +struct ptrace_peeksiginfo_args {
> +	__u64 off;	/* from which siginfo to start */
Cough... You are optimist. You want to handle the case when the
tracee has 1 << 33 or more pending sigqueues. OK good luck ;)
Looks correct, just one nit.
> +	for (i = 0; i < arg.nr; i++) {
> ...
> +		data += sizeof(siginfo_t);
> +
> +		if (signal_pending(current)) {
> +			i++; /* accounting the current siginfo */
> +			break;
> +		}
Imho, this is confusing. Just do
	for (i = 0; i < arg.nr; ) {
		...
		data += sizeof(siginfo_t);
		i++;
		if (signal_pending(current))
			break;
Oleg.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
 
