linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/3] build linux-next without perl

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 27 Feb 2013 19:53:28 +0100
From:	Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>
To:	John Spencer <maillist-linux@...fooze.de>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Rob Landley <rob@...dley.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] build linux-next without perl

On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 05:55:31PM +0100, John Spencer wrote:
> Rob Landley wrote:
>>  Before 2.6.25 building Linux never required perl. This patch series 
> removes
>>  the requirement from basic kernel builds (tested on i686, x86_64, arm, 
>> 
> mips,
>>  powerpc, sparc, sh4, and m68k). Now updated to 3.8-rc1.
>
> using this patch series since 2.6.32 in sabotage linux, it is highly  
> useful and it's about time to get it merged.
> tested against linux 3.8, works perfectly.

Why do you apply this patch serie to sabotage linux?

	Sam
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/