linux-kernel - [ 51/86] target: Fix divide by zero bug in fabric_max

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20130226235918.195820918@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:	Tue, 26 Feb 2013 16:07:59 -0800
From:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	target-devel <target-devel@...r.kernel.org>
Cc:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	stable@...r.kernel.org, Nicholas Bellinger <nab@...ux-iscsi.org>,
	Herton Ronaldo Krzesinski <herton.krzesinski@...onical.com>
Subject: [ 51/86] target: Fix divide by zero bug in fabric_max_sectors for unconfigured devices

3.4-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------


From: Nicholas Bellinger <nab@...ux-iscsi.org>

commit 7a3cf6ca1ab2a2f7161c6dec5a787fc7a5de864e upstream

This patch fixes a possible divide by zero bug when the fabric_max_sectors
device attribute is written and backend se_device failed to be successfully
configured -> enabled.

Go ahead and use block_size=512 within se_dev_set_fabric_max_sectors()
in the event of a target_configure_device() failure case, as no valid
dev->dev_attrib.block_size value will have been setup yet.

Signed-off-by: Nicholas Bellinger <nab@...ux-iscsi.org>
Cc: Herton Ronaldo Krzesinski <herton.krzesinski@...onical.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>

---
 drivers/target/target_core_device.c |    8 +++++++-
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

--- a/drivers/target/target_core_device.c
+++ b/drivers/target/target_core_device.c
@@ -1230,6 +1230,8 @@ int se_dev_set_max_sectors(struct se_dev
 
 int se_dev_set_fabric_max_sectors(struct se_device *dev, u32 fabric_max_sectors)
 {
+	int block_size = dev->se_sub_dev->se_dev_attrib.block_size;
+
 	if (atomic_read(&dev->dev_export_obj.obj_access_count)) {
 		pr_err("dev[%p]: Unable to change SE Device"
 			" fabric_max_sectors while dev_export_obj: %d count exists\n",
@@ -1267,8 +1269,12 @@ int se_dev_set_fabric_max_sectors(struct
 	/*
 	 * Align max_sectors down to PAGE_SIZE to follow transport_allocate_data_tasks()
 	 */
+	if (!block_size) {
+		block_size = 512;
+		pr_warn("Defaulting to 512 for zero block_size\n");
+	}
 	fabric_max_sectors = se_dev_align_max_sectors(fabric_max_sectors,
-						      dev->se_sub_dev->se_dev_attrib.block_size);
+						      block_size);
 
 	dev->se_sub_dev->se_dev_attrib.fabric_max_sectors = fabric_max_sectors;
 	pr_debug("dev[%p]: SE Device max_sectors changed to %u\n",


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/