[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130227200907.GA19205@sergelap>
Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2013 14:09:07 -0600
From: Serge Hallyn <serge.hallyn@...ntu.com>
To: "Raphael S.Carvalho" <raphael.scarv@...il.com>
Cc: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
Serge Hallyn <serge.hallyn@...onical.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@...lyn.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] kernel/nsproxy.c: Improving a snippet of code.
Quoting Raphael S.Carvalho (raphael.scarv@...il.com):
> It seems GCC generates a better code in that way, so I changed that statement.
> Btw, they have the same semantic, so I'm sending this patch due to performance issues.
>
> Signed-off-by: Raphael S.Carvalho <raphael.scarv@...il.com>
Acked-by: Serge E. Hallyn <serge.hallyn@...ntu.com>
> ---
> kernel/nsproxy.c | 3 ++-
> 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/nsproxy.c b/kernel/nsproxy.c
> index 78e2ecb..21da3d1 100644
> --- a/kernel/nsproxy.c
> +++ b/kernel/nsproxy.c
> @@ -148,7 +148,8 @@ int copy_namespaces(unsigned long flags, struct task_struct *tsk)
> * means share undolist with parent, so we must forbid using
> * it along with CLONE_NEWIPC.
> */
> - if ((flags & CLONE_NEWIPC) && (flags & CLONE_SYSVSEM)) {
> + if ((flags & (CLONE_NEWIPC | CLONE_SYSVSEM)) ==
> + (CLONE_NEWIPC | CLONE_SYSVSEM)) {
> err = -EINVAL;
> goto out;
> }
> --
> 1.7.2.5
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists