[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <512E8E48.8020007@codeaurora.org>
Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2013 14:52:56 -0800
From: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>
To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
CC: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
linux-parisc@...r.kernel.org, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...ux.intel.com>,
Helge Deller <deller@....de>,
Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@...era.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Consolidate CONFIG_DEBUG_STRICT_USER_COPY_CHECK
On 02/27/13 14:19, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> On 02/27/2013 12:42 PM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
>>> It's fine to do your patch as a first step though, which would not
>>> change the behavior.
>> A lot of arches seem to not want to enable it because false positives
>> are everywhere. It really depends on how good the compiler is at doing
>> constant propagation and dead code removal.
>>
> Although some of the cases I have seen being flagged as "false
> positives" have been real bugs.
There were so many false-positives on x86_64 that Andrew eventually
dropped my patch to add support for this option to the copy_from_user()
function there.
--
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
hosted by The Linux Foundation
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists