[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <512F2201.6010407@mimc.co.uk>
Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2013 09:23:13 +0000
From: Mark Jackson <mpfj-list@...c.co.uk>
To: "Philip, Avinash" <avinashphilip@...com>
CC: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
"linux-next@...r.kernel.org" <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org" <linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org>,
lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: linux-next: JFFS2 corruption
On 28/02/13 04:11, Philip, Avinash wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 20:42:01, Mark Jackson wrote:
>>
>> Okay, just tested 3v8 plus:-
>>
>> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/1931251/
>> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/1931221/
>> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/1931201/
>> and changed drivers/mtd/nand/elm.c, line 388 "ti,am33xx-elm" to "ti,am3352-elm"
>>
>> This produces an identical corruption.
>>
>> I have also tested next-20130225 and next-20130227, and both cause the same corruption.
>
> JFFS2 is not supported in am335x with BCH8 ecc scheme because of ECC layout constraints.
> Reasons for disabling JFFS2 support documented in the wiki
> http://processors.wiki.ti.com/index.php/AM335x_JFFS2_Support_Guide#Reasons_for_disabling_JFFS2_support
Aha ... thanks for the link.
I'll move over to UBIFS then, although I did have issues with that too (which is why I went back
to JFFS2), but I'll start another thread if needs be.
Cheers
Mark J.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists