[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAMP5XgdE-Ui9qiLGjvAXk13LbCzn-bHEC_AsxQ8dWpz+R-qSDg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2013 17:05:01 -0800
From: Arve Hjønnevåg <arve@...roid.com>
To: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
Cc: John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>,
lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Android Kernel Team <kernel-team@...roid.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] staging: android: lowmemorykiller: Add config option
to support oom_adj values
On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 4:14 PM, David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com> wrote:
> On Wed, 27 Feb 2013, Arve Hjønnevåg wrote:
>
>> Because, without this patch, the values written to
>> /sys/module/lowmemorykiller/parameters/adj do not get adjusted and
>> therefore do not match the correct processes.
>>
>
> Explain how this can possibly be consistent if your system includes two
> processes, one writing oom_adj values and one writing oom_score_adj
> values, and the kernel has this new option enabled?
These values are all written by the same process. If you want to
improve this, the lowmemorykiller will need a separate score_adj
parameter so that it knows for sure which type of value it receives.
You changed the meaning of /sys/module/lowmemorykiller/parameters/adj.
This patch restores the old behavior as long as the values you write
are within the range oom_adj, while still supporting the new behavior
you added in the likely case that one of the values are out of range
for oom_adj.
--
Arve Hjønnevåg
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists