[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <512F93C2.7050105@pr.hu>
Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2013 18:28:34 +0100
From: Boszormenyi Zoltan <zboszor@...hu>
To: Azat Khuzhin <dohardgopro@...il.com>
CC: lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: loadavg question
Hi,
yes, that commit is in my kernel 3.7.9 kernel source, but not in 3.3.2.
Also, I have CONFIG_NO_HZ=n in my .config. I will retry with
CONFIG_NO_HZ=y with 3.7.9.
Thanks,
Zoltán Böszörményi
2013-02-28 15:05 keltezĂŠssel, Azat Khuzhin Ărta:
>
> Hi,
>
> Could you check do you have commit that mentioned here?
> http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/1346108
>
> Respectfully
> Azat Khuzhin.
> >From phone.
>
> On Feb 28, 2013 4:40 PM, "Boszormenyi Zoltan" <zboszor@...hu <mailto:zboszor@...hu>> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> on an embedded PC (500MHz AMD Geode), we recently tried
> to upgrade the kernel. The original version was 2.6.27, the new
> ones were 3.3.x and 3.7.x. With the same userspace (a GTK based
> GUI constantly querying daemons handling different pieces of
> hardware over serial ports), we noticed that loadavg is different
> while the idle time (95-97%) is the same. On 2.6.27, the load was
> around 0.05-0.3 while on 3.3.x and 3.7.x, it quickly crawled up
> to around 5. Has the load calculation changed so dramatically
> after 2.6.27?
>
> Thanks in advance,
> ZoltĂĄn BĂśszĂśrmĂŠnyi
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org <mailto:majordomo@...r.kernel.org>
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists