linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH -next 3/3] cpufreq: conservative: Fix relation when decreasing frequency

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAKohpoksRRLmEcpA5g23ZsMmvovVh3=m3sqVUPZqs-j5xQ-V6Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Thu, 28 Feb 2013 11:35:04 +0530
From:	Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To:	Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
Cc:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, cpufreq@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, Namhyung Kim <namhyung.kim@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next 3/3] cpufreq: conservative: Fix relation when
 decreasing frequency

On 28 February 2013 11:29, Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org> wrote:
> When decreasing, we were on a higher frequency than target so selecting
> above or equal to the target frequency seems to be "conservative".

I will buy that. For all three patches:

Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/