linux-kernel - Re: sched: CPU #1's llc-sibling CPU #0 is not on the same node!

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CA+55aFz8Yx4=d=Lrmir0Vy0jhUBJMgfrJegDWsDByf28c0MuRQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Thu, 28 Feb 2013 19:13:12 -0800
From:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:	Lai Jiangshan <laijs@...fujitsu.com>,
	Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>,
	Yasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@...fujitsu.com>,
	Tang Chen <tangchen@...fujitsu.com>,
	Don Morris <don.morris@...com>,
	Tim Gardner <tim.gardner@...onical.com>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
	Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
	Thomas Renninger <trenn@...e.de>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
	Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@...el.com>
Subject: Re: sched: CPU #1's llc-sibling CPU #0 is not on the same node!

On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 1:26 PM, Andrew Morton
<akpm@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
>
> So I'm thinking that the best approach here is to revert everything and
> then try again for 3.10-rc1.  This gives people time to test the code
> while it's only in linux-next.  (Hint!)

I'd prefer to revert too by now - the bug seems to be known, and
apparently it's not a trivial fix. We're getting close to the end of
the merge window, and it's still being discussed, it clearly wasn't
really fully cooked.

Can we agree on some minimal set of reverts? Can somebody send me a
patch with the revert and the commit explanation for the revert?
Yinghai? Or I can do the reverts too if just the exact set of commits
is clear, but I'd rather get it from somebody who sees and understand
the problem, and can test the state afterwards..

               Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/