[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130301053123.GA30500@in.ibm.com>
Date: Fri, 1 Mar 2013 11:01:23 +0530
From: Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@...ibm.com>
To: Timo Juhani Lindfors <timo.lindfors@....fi>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Anil S Keshavamurthy <anil.s.keshavamurthy@...el.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com>
Subject: Re: kprobing "hash_64.constprop.26" crashes the system, recursion
through get_kprobe?
On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 11:42:41AM +0200, Timo Juhani Lindfors wrote:
>
> There is a long-standing problem in the systemtap community where
> accidentally kprobing a delicate function causes the system to crash:
>
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=604453
> http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2725
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=655904
> http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13659
>
> The current solution is to mark these functions with __kprobes that
> places them to a separate kprobe-free section (from __kprobes_text_start
> to __kprobes_text_end). This has the nice side effect that also inlined
> copies of innocent functions can not be kprobed when they are called
> from functions marked with __kprobes.
>
> Now, hash_64 is marked "inline" but this is only a hint for the
> compiler. On my Debian unstable system (Linux 3.7.3-1~experimental.1)
> hash_64 actually exists in six different places thanks to the GCC
> ipa-cp (interprocedural constant propagation) optimization:
I am unable to recreate this problem on a fedora system; hash_64 is
inlined AFAICS.
> crashes the system. I used the "xm dump-core" facility of xen to dump
> the memory of the domU and obtained the following bactrace using
> "crash vm.img /usr/lib/debug/boot/vmlinux-3.7-trunk-amd64" and
> "for bt":
>
> PID: 3007 TASK: ffff88003b9bb840 CPU: 0 COMMAND: "insmod"
> #0 [ffff88003db99998] __schedule at ffffffff813777f8
> #1 [ffff88003db999a8] hash_64.constprop.26 at ffffffff81099909
> #2 [ffff88003db999d0] get_kprobe at ffffffff8137c5bb
> #3 [ffff88003db999e0] kprobe_exceptions_notify at ffffffff8137a3c1
> #4 [ffff88003db99a40] notifier_call_chain at ffffffff8137b5a3
> #5 [ffff88003db99a80] notify_die at ffffffff8137b60c
> #6 [ffff88003db99ab0] do_int3 at ffffffff81378fa0
> #7 [ffff88003db99ad0] xen_int3 at ffffffff8137887e
> [exception RIP: hash_64.constprop.26+1]
> RIP: ffffffff81099909 RSP: ffff88003db99b80 RFLAGS: 00000086
> RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffffffff81099908 RCX: 00000000ffffffff
> RDX: ffff88003db99c38 RSI: 0000000000000002 RDI: ffffffff81099908
> RBP: 0000000000000002 R8: 0000000000000000 R9: ffffffff81629b10
> R10: 00000000000066a8 R11: ffffffffa016a000 R12: ffff88003f80dd90
> R13: ffffffff81099908 R14: ffffffff81099909 R15: ffffffffa016a010
> ORIG_RAX: ffffffffffffffff CS: 10000e030 SS: e02b
> #8 [ffff88003db99b80] get_kprobe at ffffffff8137c5bb
> #9 [ffff88003db99b90] kprobe_exceptions_notify at ffffffff8137a3c1
> #10 [ffff88003db99bf0] notifier_call_chain at ffffffff8137b5a3
> #11 [ffff88003db99c30] notify_die at ffffffff8137b60c
> #12 [ffff88003db99c60] do_int3 at ffffffff81378fa0
> #13 [ffff88003db99c80] xen_int3 at ffffffff8137887e
> [exception RIP: hash_64.constprop.26+1]
> RIP: ffffffff81099909 RSP: ffff88003db99d30 RFLAGS: 00000246
> RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffffffff81099908 RCX: ffffffffa0000521
> RDX: ffffffff81099908 RSI: ffffffff81099908 RDI: ffffffff81099908
> RBP: ffff88003db99e10 R8: 000000000000140b R9: ffffffff81099908
> R10: 00000000000066a8 R11: ffffffffa016a000 R12: ffffffff81099908
> R13: ffffffff81099903 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: ffffffffa016a010
> ORIG_RAX: ffffffffffffffff CS: e030 SS: e02b
> #14 [ffff88003db99d30] get_kprobe at ffffffff8137c5bb
> #15 [ffff88003db99d40] __recover_optprobed_insn at ffffffff8102d4d4
> #16 [ffff88003db99d70] recover_probed_instruction at ffffffff8102d479
> #17 [ffff88003db99d90] can_optimize at ffffffff8137a952
> #18 [ffff88003db99e50] arch_prepare_optimized_kprobe at ffffffff8137ab2c
> #19 [ffff88003db99ea0] alloc_aggr_kprobe.isra.17 at ffffffff8137bb9b
> #20 [ffff88003db99ec0] register_kprobe at ffffffff8137cf16
> #21 [ffff88003db99f00] init_module at ffffffffa000600d [testcase1]
> #22 [ffff88003db99f10] do_one_initcall at ffffffff810020b6
> #23 [ffff88003db99f40] sys_init_module at ffffffff81083c4f
> #24 [ffff88003db99f80] system_call_fastpath at ffffffff8137d6e9
> RIP: 00007f4aef62414a RSP: 00007fffbd2e9d08 RFLAGS: 00000202
> RAX: 00000000000000af RBX: ffffffff8137d6e9 RCX: 00007f4aef62048a
> RDX: 00007f4aef8e3f68 RSI: 000000000002b833 RDI: 00007f4aefcca000
> RBP: 00007f4af0a391a0 R8: 0000000000000003 R9: 0000000000000000
> R10: 00007f4aef62048a R11: 0000000000000202 R12: 00007f4aef8e3f68
> R13: 00007f4af0a39270 R14: 00007f4af0a38090 R15: 0000000000000000
> ORIG_RAX: 00000000000000af CS: e033 SS: e02b
>
>
> It seems that the recursion occurs even before register_kprobe
> returns. I am not sure how this should be solved. Should we mark hash_64
> with __kprobes? Or perhaps with __attribute__((always_inline))?
This is a clear case of recursion. Either of the two options should fix
the problem.
Ananth
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists