linux-kernel - Re: sched: CPU #1's llc-sibling CPU #0 is not on the same node!

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <51304C96.3010801@zytor.com>
Date:	Thu, 28 Feb 2013 22:37:10 -0800
From:	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To:	Martin Bligh <mbligh@...igh.org>
CC:	Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
	Don Morris <don.morris@...com>, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Tim Gardner <tim.gardner@...onical.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com,
	x86@...nel.org, a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl, jarkko.sakkinen@...el.com,
	tangchen@...fujitsu.com
Subject: Re: sched: CPU #1's llc-sibling CPU #0 is not on the same node!

On 02/25/2013 08:51 PM, Martin Bligh wrote:
>> Do you mean we can remove numaq x86 32bit code now?
> 
> Wouldn't bother me at all. The machine is from 1995, end of life c. 2000?
> Was useful in the early days of getting NUMA up and running on Linux,
> but is now too old to be a museum piece, really.
> 

I'd be very happy to get the NUMAQ code ripped out.  I am wondering if
there are any reasons to keep any 32-bit x86 NUMA code at all.

	-hpa


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/