[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <513102D0.5030609@wwwdotorg.org>
Date: Fri, 01 Mar 2013 12:34:40 -0700
From: Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
CC: Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@...dia.com>,
"sameo@...ux.intel.com" <sameo@...ux.intel.com>,
"gg@...mlogic.co.uk" <gg@...mlogic.co.uk>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Stephen Warren <swarren@...dia.com>,
"ian@...mlogic.co.uk" <ian@...mlogic.co.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mfd: palmas: provide irq flags through DT/platform data
On 03/01/2013 06:16 AM, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 01, 2013 at 06:25:24PM +0530, Laxman Dewangan wrote:
>> On Friday 01 March 2013 06:13 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
>
>>> This can't be a generic problem on ARM systems, I'm pretty sure
>>> the primary users of palmas would've noticed, this is more of a
>>> new feature isn't it?
>
>> I think it is tested with eval board and connected to gpio
>> interrupt and hence it is not noticed.
>
> One of the palmas chips is the default PMIC for OMAP5 isn't it?
A tangential question more re: DT bindings for it:
Is Palmas a family of chips rather than a single chip then? That
implies that the DT would need two compatible values, e.g.:
compatible = "ti,12345", "ti,palmas";
... where "12345" is the actual chip name.
... rather than just the following which IIRC was in the example in
the DT binding document in another patch series:
compatible = "ti,palmas";
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists