linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] Add automatic bus number support for i2c busses with device tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAD=FV=XnhG_gM7mFLRHKt=j3a249QsbbgDb4cTCGa7297svVeQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Thu, 28 Feb 2013 16:55:36 -0800
From:	Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
To:	Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>
Cc:	"linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org" <linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org>,
	Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>,
	Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@...sung.com>,
	Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>,
	Thomas Abraham <thomas.abraham@...aro.org>,
	Padmavathi Venna <padma.v@...sung.com>,
	Ben Dooks <ben-linux@...ff.org>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org,
	Haojian Zhuang <haojian.zhuang@...il.com>,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
	Sylwester Nawrocki <sylvester.nawrocki@...il.com>,
	Karol Lewandowski <k.lewandowsk@...sung.com>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Haojian Zhuang <haojian.zhuang@...vell.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] Add automatic bus number support for i2c busses
 with device tree

Wolfram,

On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 3:25 PM, Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de> wrote:
>
> Regarding patch 1, I was waiting for the idr changes to hit mainline.
> They are mainline now, but since the removal of MAX_IDR_MASK your patch
> doesn't apply anymore :( Can you rebase and retest, please? I'd like to
> get it into 3.9, still.

Yes, I'll rebase/retest tomorrow.  I'll let you make the call between
3.9 and 3.10.  Obviously I'd love to see it in 3.9 but I'm OK with
either.  I was just hoping not to find out at the end of the 3.10
cycle that it needs fixes and need to wait for 3.11.  I wanted to make
sure all my ducks were in a row.  ;-)


> For patch 2, some Tested-by would be nice; but it will probably make it
> into my for-next somewhen after rc1 is out.

I have no urgent need for patch 2 to land but it seemed nice to tidy
up the pxa driver and I felt it was my obligation to post it together
with patch set #1 (plus it's always nice to remove code).  Putting it
into your for-next seems like a very good solution.  That gives people
some time to test it and make sure it works for them.


Thanks!

-Doug
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/