linux-kernel - Re: libata-acpi.c ata_acpi_register_power

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <2508494.4AbRYXD1du@vostro.rjw.lan>
Date:	Fri, 01 Mar 2013 03:11:43 +0100
From:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
To:	Aaron Lu <aaron.lu@...el.com>,
	Sander Eikelenboom <linux@...elenboom.it>
Cc:	Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@...ox.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-ide@...r.kernel.org,
	Linux-pm mailing list <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: libata-acpi.c ata_acpi_register_power_resource copy and paste mistake ?

On Friday, March 01, 2013 09:59:41 AM Aaron Lu wrote:
> +Rafael
> 
> commit bc9b6407bd6df3ab7189e5622816bbc11ae9d2d8
> Author: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
> Date:   Thu Jan 17 14:11:05 2013 +0100
> 
>     ACPI / PM: Rework the handling of devices depending on power resources
> 
> -Aaron

Thanks Aaron!

> On 03/01/2013 12:45 AM, Sander Eikelenboom wrote:
> > Hi Jeff,
> > 
> > During the last merge of ahci code (d9978ec5680059d727b39d6c706777c6973587f2), i saw this coming by:
> > 
> > 
> > --- a/drivers/ata/libata-acpi.c
> > +++ b/drivers/ata/libata-acpi.c
> > @@ -1024,30 +1024,20 @@ static void ata_acpi_register_power_resource(struct ata_device *dev)
> >  {
> >         struct scsi_device *sdev = dev->sdev;
> >         acpi_handle handle;
> > -       struct device *device;
> >  
> >         handle = ata_dev_acpi_handle(dev);
> > -       if (!handle)
> > -               return;
> > -
> > -       device = &sdev->sdev_gendev;
> > -
> > -       acpi_power_resource_register_device(device, handle);
> > +       if (handle)
> > +               acpi_dev_pm_remove_dependent(handle, &sdev->sdev_gendev);
> >  }
> > 
> > shouldn't:
> > 
> > acpi_dev_pm_remove_dependent(handle, &sdev->sdev_gendev);
> > 
> > be
> > 
> > acpi_dev_pm_add_dependent(handle, &sdev->sdev_gendev);
> > 
> > in the ata_acpi_register_power_resource function ?
> > 
> > (seems like a copy and paste mistake from the unregister function)

Yes.  Sorry, my bad.

If you can prepare a patch fixing this, please do that, or I'll do it tomorrow.

Thanks,
Rafael


-- 
I speak only for myself.
Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/