linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] add extra free kbytes tunable

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <51317AD6.5020406@gmail.com>
Date:	Sat, 02 Mar 2013 12:06:46 +0800
From:	Simon Jeons <simon.jeons@...il.com>
To:	Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>
CC:	Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
	dormando <dormando@...ia.net>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
	Seiji Aguchi <seiji.aguchi@....com>,
	Satoru Moriya <satoru.moriya@....com>,
	Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...otime.net>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
	"lwoodman@...hat.com" <lwoodman@...hat.com>,
	Mel Gorman <mel@....ul.ie>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] add extra free kbytes tunable

On 03/02/2013 11:08 AM, Hugh Dickins wrote:
> On Sat, 2 Mar 2013, Simon Jeons wrote:
>> On 03/02/2013 09:42 AM, Hugh Dickins wrote:
>>> On Sat, 2 Mar 2013, Simon Jeons wrote:
>>>> In function __add_to_swap_cache if add to radix tree successfully will
>>>> result
>>>> in increase NR_FILE_PAGES, why? This is anonymous page instead of file
>>>> backed
>>>> page.
>>> Right, that's hard to understand without historical background.
>>>
>>> I think the quick answer would be that we used to (and still do) think
>>> of file-cache and swap-cache as two halves of page-cache.  And then when
>> shmem page should be treated as file-cache or swap-cache? It is strange since
>> it is consist of anonymous pages and these pages establish files.
> A shmem page is swap-backed file-cache, and it may get transferred to or
> from swap-cache: yes, it's a difficult and confusing case, as I said below.
>
> I would never call it "anonymous", but it is counted in /proc/meminfo's
> Active(anon) or Inactive(anon) rather than in (file), because "anon"
> there is shorthand for "swap-backed".

Oh, I see. Thanks. :)

>
>>> So you'll find that shmem and swap are counted as file in some places
>>> and anon in others, and it's hard to grasp which is where and why,
>>> without remembering the history.
> Hugh

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/