[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5131438B.4090507@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 02 Mar 2013 08:10:51 +0800
From: Simon Jeons <simon.jeons@...il.com>
To: Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>
CC: Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
dormando <dormando@...ia.net>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
Seiji Aguchi <seiji.aguchi@....com>,
Satoru Moriya <satoru.moriya@....com>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...otime.net>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
"lwoodman@...hat.com" <lwoodman@...hat.com>,
Mel Gorman <mel@....ul.ie>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] add extra free kbytes tunable
On 03/02/2013 06:33 AM, Hugh Dickins wrote:
> On Fri, 1 Mar 2013, Simon Jeons wrote:
>> On 03/01/2013 05:22 PM, Simon Jeons wrote:
>>> On 02/23/2013 01:56 AM, Johannes Weiner wrote:
>>>> Mapped file pages have to get scanned twice before they are reclaimed
>>>> because we don't have enough usage information after the first scan.
>>> It seems that just VM_EXEC mapped file pages are protected.
>>> Issue in page reclaim subsystem:
>>> static inline int page_is_file_cache(struct page *page)
>>> {
>>> return !PageSwapBacked(page);
>>> }
>>> AFAIK, PG_swapbacked is set if anonymous page added to swap cache, and be
>>> cleaned if removed from swap cache. So anonymous pages which are reclaimed
>>> and add to swap cache won't have this flag, then they will be treated as
>> s/are/aren't
> PG_swapbacked != PG_swapcache
Oh, I see. Thanks Hugh, thanks for your patient. :)
In function __add_to_swap_cache if add to radix tree successfully will
result in increase NR_FILE_PAGES, why? This is anonymous page instead of
file backed page.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists