[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+55aFycg=7eyQRWg1Mp=NKcG1A=P5TLmDJw_OUEZynHRKfGZA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 1 Mar 2013 17:35:29 -0800
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Davidlohr Bueso <davidlohr.bueso@...com>
Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
"Vinod, Chegu" <chegu_vinod@...com>,
"Low, Jason" <jason.low2@...com>,
linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, aquini@...hat.com,
Michel Lespinasse <walken@...gle.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Larry Woodman <lwoodman@...hat.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/2] ipc: do not hold ipc lock more than necessary
On Fri, Mar 1, 2013 at 5:32 PM, Linus Torvalds
<torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 1, 2013 at 4:16 PM, Davidlohr Bueso <davidlohr.bueso@...com> wrote:
>>
>> With Rik's semop-multi.c microbenchmark we can see the following
>> results:
>
> Ok, that certainly looks very good.
Side note: it's fairly late in the merge window, and I don't feel
comfy merging this without more testing and more people looking at it,
so I think this is a 3.10 thing. But it would be great to see ipc
people really look at the patches, and perhaps run a few real loads to
see if it's even noticeable in practice..
Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists