lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130302155942.GA353@rhlx01.hs-esslingen.de>
Date:	Sat, 2 Mar 2013 16:59:42 +0100
From:	Andreas Mohr <andi@...as.de>
To:	Neil Horman <nhorman@...driver.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Neil Horman <nhorman@...driver.com>,
	Prarit Bhargava <prarit@...hat.com>,
	Don Zickus <dzickus@...hat.com>,
	Don Dutile <ddutile@...hat.com>,
	Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
	Asit Mallick <asit.k.mallick@...el.com>,
	linux-pci@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] irq: add quirk for broken interrupt remapping on 55XX
 chipsets

Hi,

> if ((revision == 0x13) && irq_remapping_enabled) {
> +		pr_warn("WARNING WARNING WARNING WARNING WARNING
> WARNING\n"
> +			"This system BIOS has enabled interrupt
> remapping\n"
> +			"on a chipset that contains an errata making
> that\n"
> +			"feature unstable.  Please reboot with
> nointremap\n"
> +			"added to the kernel command line and contact\n"
> +			"your BIOS vendor for an update");
> +	}

Forgive me, but ISTR that there's a special BIOS firmware quirk bug annotating
logger warning message mechanism (have I managed to hit all keywords yet? ;)
in the kernel which might be useful in this case.


OK, found something (but I don't think it was the mechanism
that ISTR - perhaps it got modernized?):


include/linux/printk.h:

/*
 * FW_BUG
 * Add this to a message where you are sure the firmware is buggy or
 * behaves
 * really stupid or out of spec. Be aware that the responsible BIOS
 * developer
 * should be able to fix this issue or at least get a concrete idea of
 * the
 * problem by reading your message without the need of looking at the
 * kernel
 * code.
 *
 * Use it for definite and high priority BIOS bugs.
 *
 * FW_WARN
 * Use it for not that clear (e.g. could the kernel messed up things
 * already?)
 * and medium priority BIOS bugs.
 *
 * FW_INFO
 * Use this one if you want to tell the user or vendor about something
 * suspicious, but generally harmless related to the firmware.
 *
 * Use it for information or very low priority BIOS bugs.
 */


So perhaps it is appropriate to be used here.


HTH,

Andreas Mohr
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ