linux-kernel - Re: fasync race in fs/fcntl.c

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sat, 2 Mar 2013 17:54:41 +0000
From:	Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>
To:	Russ Dill <russ.dill@...il.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: fasync race in fs/fcntl.c

On Sat, Mar 02, 2013 at 03:00:28AM -0800, Russ Dill wrote:

> CPU0 calls syscall fcntl(fd, F_SETFL, FASYNC)
> fcntl calls fdget_raw, the count on the filp is 1, so it is not
> incremented (no reference taken)
> fcntl calls do_fcntl, which calls setfl which calls filp->op->fasync
> which calls fasync_helper
> fasync_helper calls fasync_add_entry, which calls fasync_insert_entry
> fasync_insert_entry adds a fasync_struct to the list for the current
> filp and assigns the pointer,
> before getting to filp->f_flags |= FASYNC, we go to CPU1
> 
> CPU1 calls fput on the same filp, the counter is decremented to 0 and
> that filp is either added to the delayed_fput_list or scheduled for
> ____fput task_work.

Stop here.  Just how does CPU1 manage to do that?  fdget_raw() will not
increment ->f_count *only* if there's nobody else with reference to its
descriptor table.  And if ->f_count is 1, we'd better have no references
outside of that descriptor table.

So where had the reference dropped by process on CPU1 come from?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/