linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH V2] MAINTAINERS: Update SIMTEC file patterns, remove Vincent Sanders

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <51328D83.9030105@cesarb.net>
Date:	Sat, 02 Mar 2013 20:38:43 -0300
From:	Cesar Eduardo Barros <cesarb@...arb.net>
To:	Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
CC:	Paul Bolle <pebolle@...cali.nl>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Simtec Linux Team <linux@...tec.co.uk>,
	Ben Dooks <ben-linux@...ff.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] MAINTAINERS: Update SIMTEC file patterns, remove Vincent
 Sanders

Em 01-03-2013 17:37, Joe Perches escreveu:
> On Fri, 2013-03-01 at 21:20 +0100, Paul Bolle wrote:
>> On Fri, 2013-03-01 at 12:02 -0800, Joe Perches wrote:
>>> commit 85fd6d6 ("ARM: S3C2410: move mach-s3c2410/* into mach-s3c24xx/")
>>> moved the files, update the F: patterns.
>>
>> The BAST MAINTAINER entry has come up a few times already. I commented
>> on the last time that happened in https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/11/24/96 .
>> Nothing has changed. I suggest to remove this entry entirely.
>
> Seems sensible to me.  Ben?
>
> I'm a bit surprised that all of Cesar Eduardo Barros' patches
> to MAINTAINERS weren't applied.  I thought they were.  It
> seems that only some of them are in.
>
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/11/23/439
>
> Cesar?  Can you please resend whatever scraps weren't applied
> and make sure you cc Andrew Morton?

I just checked on my local tree, and it is only the BAST one. For some 
reason, Andrew Morton did not add that one to his tree (probably because 
there was discussion about removing the whole block instead of fixing 
it, so he prefered to take the uncontroversial ones only).

The ones which were not in Andrew's tree all went in via other trees.

It might be best for me to make a new series instead. My 
checkmaintainers.py already gives me 15 lines of output, and that is on 
top of what I have pending (BAST and part 2 of the uapi mess) rebased 
over the Linus tree. On the Linus tree, it gives me 42 lines of output.

-- 
Cesar Eduardo Barros
cesarb@...arb.net
cesar.barros@...il.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/