linux-kernel - [PATCH 10/31] workqueue: remove workqueue_struct->pool

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1362194662-2344-11-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org>
Date:	Fri,  1 Mar 2013 19:24:01 -0800
From:	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, laijs@...fujitsu.com
Cc:	axboe@...nel.dk, jmoyer@...hat.com, zab@...hat.com,
	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 10/31] workqueue: remove workqueue_struct->pool_wq.single

workqueue->pool_wq union is used to point either to percpu pwqs
(pool_workqueues) or single unbound pwq.  As the first pwq can be
accessed via workqueue->pwqs list, there's no reason for the single
pointer anymore.

Use list_first_entry(workqueue->pwqs) to access the unbound pwq and
drop workqueue->pool_wq.single pointer and the pool_wq union.  It
simplifies the code and eases implementing multiple unbound pools w/
custom attributes.

This patch doesn't introduce any visible behavior changes.

Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
---
 kernel/workqueue.c | 26 ++++++++++++--------------
 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/workqueue.c b/kernel/workqueue.c
index cbdc2ac..79840b9 100644
--- a/kernel/workqueue.c
+++ b/kernel/workqueue.c
@@ -188,11 +188,7 @@ struct wq_flusher {
  */
 struct workqueue_struct {
 	unsigned int		flags;		/* W: WQ_* flags */
-	union {
-		struct pool_workqueue __percpu		*pcpu;
-		struct pool_workqueue			*single;
-		unsigned long				v;
-	} pool_wq;				/* I: pwq's */
+	struct pool_workqueue __percpu *cpu_pwqs; /* I: per-cpu pwq's */
 	struct list_head	pwqs;		/* I: all pwqs of this wq */
 	struct list_head	list;		/* W: list of all workqueues */
 
@@ -471,9 +467,11 @@ static struct pool_workqueue *get_pwq(int cpu, struct workqueue_struct *wq)
 {
 	if (!(wq->flags & WQ_UNBOUND)) {
 		if (likely(cpu < nr_cpu_ids))
-			return per_cpu_ptr(wq->pool_wq.pcpu, cpu);
-	} else if (likely(cpu == WORK_CPU_UNBOUND))
-		return wq->pool_wq.single;
+			return per_cpu_ptr(wq->cpu_pwqs, cpu);
+	} else if (likely(cpu == WORK_CPU_UNBOUND)) {
+		return list_first_entry(&wq->pwqs, struct pool_workqueue,
+					pwqs_node);
+	}
 	return NULL;
 }
 
@@ -3087,8 +3085,8 @@ static int alloc_and_link_pwqs(struct workqueue_struct *wq)
 	int cpu;
 
 	if (!(wq->flags & WQ_UNBOUND)) {
-		wq->pool_wq.pcpu = alloc_percpu(struct pool_workqueue);
-		if (!wq->pool_wq.pcpu)
+		wq->cpu_pwqs = alloc_percpu(struct pool_workqueue);
+		if (!wq->cpu_pwqs)
 			return -ENOMEM;
 
 		for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
@@ -3104,7 +3102,6 @@ static int alloc_and_link_pwqs(struct workqueue_struct *wq)
 		if (!pwq)
 			return -ENOMEM;
 
-		wq->pool_wq.single = pwq;
 		pwq->pool = get_std_worker_pool(WORK_CPU_UNBOUND, highpri);
 		list_add_tail(&pwq->pwqs_node, &wq->pwqs);
 	}
@@ -3115,9 +3112,10 @@ static int alloc_and_link_pwqs(struct workqueue_struct *wq)
 static void free_pwqs(struct workqueue_struct *wq)
 {
 	if (!(wq->flags & WQ_UNBOUND))
-		free_percpu(wq->pool_wq.pcpu);
-	else
-		kmem_cache_free(pwq_cache, wq->pool_wq.single);
+		free_percpu(wq->cpu_pwqs);
+	else if (!list_empty(&wq->pwqs))
+		kmem_cache_free(pwq_cache, list_first_entry(&wq->pwqs,
+					struct pool_workqueue, pwqs_node));
 }
 
 static int wq_clamp_max_active(int max_active, unsigned int flags,
-- 
1.8.1.2

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/