[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130304035527.GF3401@two.firstfloor.org>
Date: Mon, 4 Mar 2013 04:55:27 +0100
From: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Cc: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
Eliezer Tamir <eliezer.tamir@...ux.jf.intel.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Dave Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@...el.com>,
e1000-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
Willem de Bruijn <willemb@...gle.com>, HPA <hpa@...or.com>,
Eliezer Tamir <eliezer@...ir.org.il>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/5] net: implement support for low latency socket
polling
On Sun, Mar 03, 2013 at 01:20:01PM -0800, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> On Sun, 2013-03-03 at 20:21 +0100, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > > Alternative to 2) would be to use a generation id, incremented every
> > > time a napi used in spin polling enabled driver is dismantled (and freed
> > > after RCU grace period)
> > >
> > > And store in sockets not only the pointer to napi_struct, but the
> > > current generation id : If the generation id doesnt match, disable
> > > the spinpoll until next packet rebuilds the cache again.
> >
> > This would require rcu_read_lock, aka preempt off, during polling, right?
> >
>
> Of course, polling probably needs BH disabling as well to get the per
> napi lock
Ok maybe the cond_resched() is good enough.
-Andi
--
ak@...ux.intel.com -- Speaking for myself only.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists