linux-kernel - [ 108/153] ocfs2: ac->ac_allow_chain_relink=0 wont disable group relink

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20130304033718.262730828@decadent.org.uk>
Date:	Mon, 04 Mar 2013 03:38:55 +0000
From:	Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, "Xiaowei.Hu" <xiaowei.hu@...cle.com>,
	Srinivas Eeda <srinivas.eeda@...cle.com>,
	Mark Fasheh <mfasheh@...e.com>,
	Joel Becker <jlbec@...lplan.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: [ 108/153] ocfs2: ac->ac_allow_chain_relink=0 wont disable group relink

3.2-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: "Xiaowei.Hu" <xiaowei.hu@...cle.com>

commit 309a85b6861fedbb48a22d45e0e079d1be993b3a upstream.

ocfs2_block_group_alloc_discontig() disables chain relink by setting
ac->ac_allow_chain_relink = 0 because it grabs clusters from multiple
cluster groups.

It doesn't keep the credits for all chain relink,but
ocfs2_claim_suballoc_bits overrides this in this call trace:
ocfs2_block_group_claim_bits()->ocfs2_claim_clusters()->
__ocfs2_claim_clusters()->ocfs2_claim_suballoc_bits()
ocfs2_claim_suballoc_bits set ac->ac_allow_chain_relink = 1; then call
ocfs2_search_chain() one time and disable it again, and then we run out
of credits.

Fix is to allow relink by default and disable it in
ocfs2_block_group_alloc_discontig.

Without this patch, End-users will run into a crash due to run out of
credits, backtrace like this:

  RIP: 0010:[<ffffffffa0808b14>]  [<ffffffffa0808b14>]
  jbd2_journal_dirty_metadata+0x164/0x170 [jbd2]
  RSP: 0018:ffff8801b919b5b8  EFLAGS: 00010246
  RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffff88022139ddc0 RCX: ffff880159f652d0
  RDX: ffff880178aa3000 RSI: ffff880159f652d0 RDI: ffff880087f09bf8
  RBP: ffff8801b919b5e8 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000
  R10: 0000000000001e00 R11: 00000000000150b0 R12: ffff880159f652d0
  R13: ffff8801a0cae908 R14: ffff880087f09bf8 R15: ffff88018d177800
  FS:  00007fc9b0b6b6e0(0000) GS:ffff88022fd40000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
  CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 000000008005003b
  CR2: 000000000040819c CR3: 0000000184017000 CR4: 00000000000006e0
  DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
  DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000ffff0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
  Process dd (pid: 9945, threadinfo ffff8801b919a000, task ffff880149a264c0)
  Call Trace:
    ocfs2_journal_dirty+0x2f/0x70 [ocfs2]
    ocfs2_relink_block_group+0x111/0x480 [ocfs2]
    ocfs2_search_chain+0x455/0x9a0 [ocfs2]
    ...

Signed-off-by: Xiaowei.Hu <xiaowei.hu@...cle.com>
Reviewed-by: Srinivas Eeda <srinivas.eeda@...cle.com>
Cc: Mark Fasheh <mfasheh@...e.com>
Cc: Joel Becker <jlbec@...lplan.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
---
 fs/ocfs2/suballoc.c |    7 +++----
 fs/ocfs2/suballoc.h |    2 +-
 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

--- a/fs/ocfs2/suballoc.c
+++ b/fs/ocfs2/suballoc.c
@@ -642,7 +642,7 @@ ocfs2_block_group_alloc_discontig(handle
 	 * cluster groups will be staying in cache for the duration of
 	 * this operation.
 	 */
-	ac->ac_allow_chain_relink = 0;
+	ac->ac_disable_chain_relink = 1;
 
 	/* Claim the first region */
 	status = ocfs2_block_group_claim_bits(osb, handle, ac, min_bits,
@@ -1823,7 +1823,7 @@ static int ocfs2_search_chain(struct ocf
 	 * Do this *after* figuring out how many bits we're taking out
 	 * of our target group.
 	 */
-	if (ac->ac_allow_chain_relink &&
+	if (!ac->ac_disable_chain_relink &&
 	    (prev_group_bh) &&
 	    (ocfs2_block_group_reasonably_empty(bg, res->sr_bits))) {
 		status = ocfs2_relink_block_group(handle, alloc_inode,
@@ -1928,7 +1928,6 @@ static int ocfs2_claim_suballoc_bits(str
 
 	victim = ocfs2_find_victim_chain(cl);
 	ac->ac_chain = victim;
-	ac->ac_allow_chain_relink = 1;
 
 	status = ocfs2_search_chain(ac, handle, bits_wanted, min_bits,
 				    res, &bits_left);
@@ -1947,7 +1946,7 @@ static int ocfs2_claim_suballoc_bits(str
 	 * searching each chain in order. Don't allow chain relinking
 	 * because we only calculate enough journal credits for one
 	 * relink per alloc. */
-	ac->ac_allow_chain_relink = 0;
+	ac->ac_disable_chain_relink = 1;
 	for (i = 0; i < le16_to_cpu(cl->cl_next_free_rec); i ++) {
 		if (i == victim)
 			continue;
--- a/fs/ocfs2/suballoc.h
+++ b/fs/ocfs2/suballoc.h
@@ -49,7 +49,7 @@ struct ocfs2_alloc_context {
 
 	/* these are used by the chain search */
 	u16    ac_chain;
-	int    ac_allow_chain_relink;
+	int    ac_disable_chain_relink;
 	group_search_t *ac_group_search;
 
 	u64    ac_last_group;


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/