linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] gpio: palmas: add in GPIO support for palmas charger

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 4 Mar 2013 11:43:39 +0100
From:	Samuel Ortiz <sameo@...ux.intel.com>
To:	Ian Lartey <ian@...mlogic.co.uk>
Cc:	Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>,
	Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@...dia.com>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linus.walleij@...aro.org" <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
	"broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com" 
	<broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>,
	Graeme Gregory <gg@...mlogic.co.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] gpio: palmas: add in GPIO support for palmas charger

Hi Ian,

On Mon, Mar 04, 2013 at 10:20:58AM +0000, Ian Lartey wrote:
> On 02/03/13 19:35, Grant Likely wrote:
> >On Sat, 2 Mar 2013 13:09:47 +0530, Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@...dia.com> wrote:
> >>On Friday 01 March 2013 10:36 PM, Ian Lartey wrote:
> >>>Palmas charger has 16 GPIOs
> >>>add palmas_gpio_[read|write|update] api to take account
> >>>second bank of GPIOs
> >>>
> >>>Signed-off-by: Ian Lartey <ian@...mlogic.co.uk>
> >>>Signed-off-by: Graeme Gregory <gg@...mlogic.co.uk>
> >>>---
> >>
> >>Looks good.
> >>Acked-by: Laxman Dewangan<ldewangan@...dia.com>
> >>
> >
> >Applied for v3.10, thanks.
> >
> >g.
> >
> >--
> >To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> >the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> >More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> >Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
> >
> Hello Grant,
> 
> For this [v2] patch I missed out that this patch depends on
> "[PATCH v2] mfd: palmas: is_palmas_charger needed by multiple drivers."
> I did have this noted in the first version of this patch - sorry.
> 
> kbuild rightly complained about the patch
> 
> Do you want to revert this patch until the
> "mfd: palmas: is_palmas_charger needed by multiple drivers"
> is also accepted ?
You should send your patches as independent patchsets, to be applied in the
right order. I'll ack the MFD patches and Grant could take both.

Cheers,
Samuel.

-- 
Intel Open Source Technology Centre
http://oss.intel.com/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/