linux-kernel - [PATCH] netfilter: nfnetlink: silence warning if CONFIG_PROVE

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1362401141.16460.24.camel@x61.thuisdomein>
Date:	Mon, 04 Mar 2013 13:45:41 +0100
From:	Paul Bolle <pebolle@...cali.nl>
To:	Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>,
	Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:	netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org, netfilter@...r.kernel.org,
	coreteam@...filter.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] netfilter: nfnetlink: silence warning if CONFIG_PROVE_RCU
 isn't set

Since commit c14b78e7decd0d1d5add6a4604feb8609fe920a9 ("netfilter:
nfnetlink: add mutex per subsystem") building nefnetlink.o without
CONFIG_PROVE_RCU set, triggers this GCC warning:
    net/netfilter/nfnetlink.c:65:22: warning: ‘nfnl_get_lock’ defined but not used [-Wunused-function]

The cause of that warning is, in short, that rcu_lockdep_assert()
compiles away if CONFIG_PROVE_RCU is not set. Silence this warning by
open coding nfnl_get_lock() in the sole place it was called, which
allows to remove that function.

Signed-off-by: Paul Bolle <pebolle@...cali.nl>
---
0) Compile tested only, but without CONFIG_PROVE_RCU set! This patch
needs building and running by someone who actually uses that option.

1) This patch triggers a checkpatch "line over 80 characters" warning.
But note that it actually shortens the line checkpatch complains about
(by one character!).

 net/netfilter/nfnetlink.c | 7 +------
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/netfilter/nfnetlink.c b/net/netfilter/nfnetlink.c
index d578ec2..0b1b32c 100644
--- a/net/netfilter/nfnetlink.c
+++ b/net/netfilter/nfnetlink.c
@@ -62,11 +62,6 @@ void nfnl_unlock(__u8 subsys_id)
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(nfnl_unlock);
 
-static struct mutex *nfnl_get_lock(__u8 subsys_id)
-{
-	return &table[subsys_id].mutex;
-}
-
 int nfnetlink_subsys_register(const struct nfnetlink_subsystem *n)
 {
 	nfnl_lock(n->subsys_id);
@@ -199,7 +194,7 @@ replay:
 			rcu_read_unlock();
 			nfnl_lock(subsys_id);
 			if (rcu_dereference_protected(table[subsys_id].subsys,
-				lockdep_is_held(nfnl_get_lock(subsys_id))) != ss ||
+				lockdep_is_held(&table[subsys_id].mutex)) != ss ||
 			    nfnetlink_find_client(type, ss) != nc)
 				err = -EAGAIN;
 			else if (nc->call)
-- 
1.7.11.7

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/