linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/5] at91: atmel_lcdfb: regression fixes and cpu

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 4 Mar 2013 15:51:33 +0100
From:	Johan Hovold <jhovold@...il.com>
To:	Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>
Cc:	Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...el.com>,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, FlorianSchandinat@....de,
	Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj@...osoft.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-fbdev@...r.kernel.org, jhovold@...il.com, jacmet@...site.dk
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] at91: atmel_lcdfb: regression fixes and cpu_is
 removal

On Sat, Feb 09, 2013 at 04:47:40PM -0800, Olof Johansson wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 08, 2013 at 05:35:13PM +0100, Nicolas Ferre wrote:
> > These patches fix a regression in 16-bpp support for older SOCs which use
> > IBGR:555 rather than BGR:565 pixel layout. Use SOC-type to determine if the
> > controller uses the intensity-bit and restore the old layout in that case.
> > 
> > The last patch is a removal of uses of cpu_is_xxxx() macros in atmel_lcdfb with
> > a platform-device-id table and static configurations.
> > 
> > 
> > Patches from Johan Hovold taken from:
> > "[PATCH 0/3] atmel_lcdfb: fix 16-bpp regression"
> > and
> > "[PATCH v2 0/3] ARM: at91/avr32/atmel_lcdfb: remove cpu_is macros"
> > patch series to form a clean patch series with my signature.
> > 
> > Arnd, Olof,
> > as it seems that old fbdev drivers are not so much reviewed those days, can we
> > take the decision to queue this material through arm-soc with other AT91
> > drivers updates?
> 
> It would be beneficial to get an ack from Florian. Was he involved in the
> review of the code that regressed 16-bpp support in the first place? When was
> the regression introduced?

Thought I'd send a reminder about these fixes. Has anyone picked them up
for 3.9-rc?

Thanks,
Johan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/