[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <201303042030.01817.arnd@arndb.de>
Date: Mon, 4 Mar 2013 20:30:01 +0000
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...e-electrons.com>
Cc: Lior Amsalem <alior@...vell.com>, Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
"Russell King - ARM Linux" <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>,
Tawfik Bayouk <tawfik@...vell.com>,
Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>,
linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...onic-design.de>,
Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@...driver.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org>,
"Eran Ben-Avi" <benavi@...vell.com>,
Nadav Haklai <nadavh@...vell.com>,
Maen Suleiman <maen@...vell.com>,
Shadi Ammouri <shadi@...vell.com>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
Gregory Clement <gregory.clement@...e-electrons.com>,
Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgunthorpe@...idianresearch.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/32] lib: devres: don't enclose pcim_*() functions in CONFIG_HAS_IOPORT
On Monday 04 March 2013, Thomas Petazzoni wrote:
> FWIW, a patch that is doing what I was initially proposing has been
> merged for 3.9, and it doesn't contain the
> IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_HAS_IOPORT) test you were proposing (and which I
> think was correct). See:
>
> commit 9ed8a30f3471347c1b763bd062fa78ae80f18eae
> Author: Jingoo Han <jg1.han@...sung.com>
> Date: Wed Feb 27 17:02:42 2013 -0800
>
Sigh.
I'll take it as an additional incentive to finally clean up the logic behind
CONFIG_HAS_IOPORT by introducing a CONFIG_HAS_IOPORT_MAP symbol to replace it.
Thanks for the heads up.
Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists