[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130304210551.GA22306@pd.tnic>
Date: Mon, 4 Mar 2013 22:05:51 +0100
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: Alexandru Gheorghiu <gheorghiuandru@...il.com>
Cc: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>,
Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: netfilter: nfnetlink: Fixed warning for
nfnl_get_lock
On Mon, Mar 04, 2013 at 09:43:11PM +0200, Alexandru Gheorghiu wrote:
> Removed unused function nfnl_get_lock which fixed the following warning:
> net/netfilter/nfnetlink.c:65:22: warning: ‘nfnl_get_lock’ defined but not used [-Wunused-function]
>
> Signed-off-by: Alexandru Gheorghiu <gheorghiuandru@...il.com>
> ---
> net/netfilter/nfnetlink.c | 5 -----
> 1 file changed, 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/netfilter/nfnetlink.c b/net/netfilter/nfnetlink.c
> index d578ec2..44aa0a7 100644
> --- a/net/netfilter/nfnetlink.c
> +++ b/net/netfilter/nfnetlink.c
> @@ -62,11 +62,6 @@ void nfnl_unlock(__u8 subsys_id)
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(nfnl_unlock);
>
> -static struct mutex *nfnl_get_lock(__u8 subsys_id)
> -{
> - return &table[subsys_id].mutex;
> -}
> -
I see the same warning here, gcc (Debian 4.7.2-5) 4.7.2.
Actually this function *is* used a bit further in the same file in
nfnetlink_rcv_msg().
But gcc complains for some reason of which I don't even have the
slightest idea. However, if you declare the above function "static
inline..." the warning is gone.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
Sent from a fat crate under my desk. Formatting is fine.
--
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists