[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <51351CC3.4010301@semaphore.gr>
Date: Tue, 05 Mar 2013 00:14:27 +0200
From: Stratos Karafotis <stratosk@...aphore.gr>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
CC: cpufreq@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH linux-next] cpufreq: conservative: Fix sampling_down_factor
functionality
sampling_down_factor tunable is unused since commit
8e677ce83bf41ba9c74e5b6d9ee60b07d4e5ed93 (4 years ago).
This patch restores the original functionality.
Signed-off-by: Stratos Karafotis <stratosk@...aphore.gr>
---
drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_conservative.c | 6 ++++++
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_conservative.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_conservative.c
index 4fd0006..4b27c21 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_conservative.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_conservative.c
@@ -87,6 +87,12 @@ static void cs_check_cpu(int cpu, unsigned int load)
return;
}
+ /* if sampling_down_factor is active break out early */
+ if (++dbs_info->down_skip < cs_tuners.sampling_down_factor)
+ return;
+
+ dbs_info->down_skip = 0;
+
/*
* The optimal frequency is the frequency that is the lowest that can
* support the current CPU usage without triggering the up policy. To be
--
1.8.1.4
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists