[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1362438937-28143-1-git-send-email-sboyd@codeaurora.org>
Date: Mon, 4 Mar 2013 15:15:37 -0800
From: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>
To: Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] ARM: perf: Fix section mismatch on armpmu_init()
WARNING: vmlinux.o(.text+0xfb80): Section mismatch in reference
from the function armpmu_register() to the function
.init.text:armpmu_init()
The function armpmu_register() references
the function __init armpmu_init().
This is often because armpmu_register lacks a __init
annotation or the annotation of armpmu_init is wrong.
Just drop the __init marking on armpmu_init() because
armpmu_register() no longer has an __init marking.
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>
---
I doubt anyone is actually experiencing any problems because this
driver probes before kernel init is over. But the warning is a bit
annoying.
arch/arm/kernel/perf_event.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/perf_event.c b/arch/arm/kernel/perf_event.c
index 31e0eb3..32081ad 100644
--- a/arch/arm/kernel/perf_event.c
+++ b/arch/arm/kernel/perf_event.c
@@ -484,7 +484,7 @@ const struct dev_pm_ops armpmu_dev_pm_ops = {
SET_RUNTIME_PM_OPS(armpmu_runtime_suspend, armpmu_runtime_resume, NULL)
};
-static void __init armpmu_init(struct arm_pmu *armpmu)
+static void armpmu_init(struct arm_pmu *armpmu)
{
atomic_set(&armpmu->active_events, 0);
mutex_init(&armpmu->reserve_mutex);
--
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum,
hosted by The Linux Foundation
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists