linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/2] dmi_scan: Refactor dmi_scan_machine(), {smbios,dmi}

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1362460980.3768.394.camel@deadeye.wl.decadent.org.uk>
Date:	Tue, 05 Mar 2013 05:23:00 +0000
From:	Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
To:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, tmhikaru@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] dmi_scan: Refactor dmi_scan_machine(),
 {smbios,dmi}_present()

On Mon, 2013-03-04 at 15:09 -0500, tmhikaru@...il.com wrote:
> 	Forgive me for bothering you about this again, I know that -stable
> has a policy of only accepting patches once Linus has accepted them
> upstream, but I'm curious what's going on here. Is there something I could
> help with to move this along? I haven't seen any discussion about it since
> Feb 16.
> 
> 	Of course this assumes that I have not missed the patch going in...
> Tim McGrath

Andrew, did you see these dmi_scan patches?  Should I repost them?

Ben.

-- 
Ben Hutchings
Always try to do things in chronological order;
it's less confusing that way.

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (829 bytes)