linux-kernel - Re: BUG: IPv4: Attempt to release TCP socket in state 1

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1303042138330.7811@localhost6.localdomain6>
Date:	Mon, 4 Mar 2013 21:44:34 -0800 (PST)
From:	dormando <dormando@...ia.net>
To:	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
cc:	Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: BUG: IPv4: Attempt to release TCP socket in state 1



On Mon, 4 Mar 2013, Eric Dumazet wrote:

> On Tue, 2013-03-05 at 11:47 +0800, Cong Wang wrote:
> > (Cc'ing the right netdev mailing list...)
> >
> > On 03/05/2013 08:01 AM, dormando wrote:
> > > Hi!
> > >
> > > I have a (core lockup?) with 3.7.6+ and 3.8.2 which appears to be under
> > > ixgbe. The machine appears to still be up but network stays in a severely
> > > hobbled state. Either lagging or not responding to the network at all.
> > >
> > > On a new box the hang happens within 8-24 hours of giving it production
> > > network traffic. On an older machine (6 cores instead of 8, etc) it can
> > > run for a week or more before hanging.
> > >
> > > The hang from 3.7 might be slightly different than 3.8. They seem to be
> > > mostly the same aside from 3.8 hanging in the GRO path. Don't see anything
> > > obvious in 3.9-rc1 that would fix it, and haven't tried 3.9-rc1.
> > >
> > > I've not yet figured out how to reproduce outside of production (as
> > > always, sigh). This doesn't seem to happen with 3.6.6, but we have
> > > different and less frequent kernel panics there.
> > >
>
> Dornando, do you use any kind of special setup, external modules,
> or netfilter ? (iptables-save output would help)
>
> Is it a pristine kernel, or a modified one ?
>

(Sigh. sorry for the misfire, thanks for fixing cc).

No 3rd party modules. There's a tiny patch for controlling initcwnd from
userspace and another one for the extra_free_kbytes tunable that I brought
up in another thread. We've had the initcwnd patch in for a long time
without trouble. The extra_free_kbytes tunable isn't even being used yet,
so all that's doing is adding a 0 somewhere.

Only two iptables rules loaded: global NOTRACK rules for PREROUTING/OUTPUT
in raw.

Kernel's as close to pristine as I can make it. We had the 10g patch in
but I've dropped it.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/