[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130305080845.GA19097@mudshark.cambridge.arm.com>
Date: Tue, 5 Mar 2013 08:08:45 +0000
From: Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
To: Rob Herring <robherring2@...il.com>
Cc: Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@...rix.com>,
"xen-devel@...ts.xen.org" <xen-devel@...ts.xen.org>,
"Keir (Xen.org)" <keir@....org>,
Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@...citrix.com>,
Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>,
Tim Deegan <tim@....org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Jan Beulich <JBeulich@...e.com>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Nicolas Pitre <nico@...xnic.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH LINUX v5] xen: event channel arrays are xen_ulong_t and
not unsigned long
On Tue, Mar 05, 2013 at 06:55:46AM +0000, Rob Herring wrote:
> > I also can't immediately see why GCC would allocate oldval to an odd base
> > register. Can you share your .config please?
> >
>
> Here's a config:
[...]
Cheers Rob, that was enough to reproduce for me. The problem is likely that
CONFIG_AEABI=n, so the ABI doesn't actually mandate even base registers for
64-bit values in registers.
Ian -- this would be fixed if you used our atomic64 routines instead of
inventing your own :)
Will
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists