linux-kernel - Re: Uhhuh. NMI received for unknown reason 2c on CPU 0.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 05 Mar 2013 02:02:48 -0800
From:	Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>
To:	Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
Cc:	Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz>, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
	Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
	Konstantin Khlebnikov <khlebnikov@...nvz.org>, x86@...nel.org,
	lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	e1000-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
	Bruce Allan <bruce.w.allan@...el.com>
Subject: Re: Uhhuh. NMI received for unknown reason 2c on CPU 0.

On Tue, 2013-03-05 at 10:58 +0100, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 05, 2013 at 10:42:17AM +0100, Jiri Slaby wrote:
> > On 03/05/2013 01:16 AM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> > > [+cc e1000-devel, Jeff, Bruce]
> > > 
> > > On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 2:50 PM, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de> wrote:
> > >> On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 10:16:41AM +0100, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> > >>> So it looks Bjorn has taken most of them and the e1000e one will go
> > >>> through the e1000e maintainers. I'll test after the merge window is
> > >>> done.
> > >>
> > >> Issue still persists on 3.9-rc1 :-( :
> > >>
> > >> Mar  4 21:47:34 nazgul vmunix: [ 3223.412541] e1000e: eth0 NIC Link is Up 100 Mbps Full Duplex, Flow Control: Rx/Tx
> > >> Mar  4 21:47:34 nazgul vmunix: [ 3223.412554] e1000e 0000:00:19.0 eth0: 10/100 speed: disabling TSO
> > >> Mar  4 21:47:35 nazgul vmunix: [ 3224.034158] Uhhuh. NMI received for unknown reason 2c on CPU 0.
> > >> Mar  4 21:47:35 nazgul vmunix: [ 3224.034166] Do you have a strange power saving mode enabled?
> > >> Mar  4 21:47:35 nazgul vmunix: [ 3224.034168] Dazed and confused, but trying to continue
> > > 
> > > The e1000e changes didn't get merged, did they?  I don't see the
> > > following changes mentioned at https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/2/4/185 in
> > > 3.9-rc1:
> > > 
> > >       e1000e: fix pci-device enable-counter balance
> > >       e1000e: fix runtime power management transitions
> > >       e1000e: fix accessing to suspended device
> > 
> > You're right. They are not even in -next :(.
> 
> Oh, and there's another issue with this driver I reported yesterday:
> http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=136243374114892&w=2:
> 
> "Trying to free already-free IRQ 20"
> 
> which happens during suspend so it seems also related.
> 
> Rafael, what's the state of those patches here:
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/2/4/185, are they ready to be tested or you
> still have issues with them?

They are in my queue of e1000e patches for net and are being testing
currently.  I should be able to push them upstream this week.

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (837 bytes)