linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH v4 0/6] uprobes: return probe implementation

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 5 Mar 2013 13:22:08 +0100
From:	Anton Arapov <anton@...hat.com>
To:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Cc:	Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
	Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Josh Stone <jistone@...hat.com>,
	Frank Eigler <fche@...hat.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@...ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v4 0/6] uprobes: return probe implementation

On Tue, Mar 05, 2013 at 01:04:17PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> 
> * Anton Arapov <anton@...hat.com> wrote:
> 
> > Hello,
> > 
> >   RFC v4 uretprobes implementation. I'd be grateful for review.
> >   /* Oleg, this one is more quirky than previous, don't beat me. */
> 
> Please include a good high level description of the new feature in one of the 
> patches - preferably also stick it somewhere into Documentation/.

  Yes, I apologize, I did wait for someone's complaint to push myself to
write meaningful description.
 
thanks,
Anton

> Thanks,
> 
> 	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/