[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1362492082-23019-1-git-send-email-fweisbec@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 5 Mar 2013 15:01:19 +0100
From: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
To: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Stanislaw Gruszka <sgruszka@...hat.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
Subject: [RFC PATCH 0/3] posix_cpu_timers: Some code consolidation
Hi,
Some interesting consolidation comes when we unify the expiry
time type.
I'm also wondering: can't we implement CPUCLOCK_PROF using CPUCLOCK_SCHED?
One is using the tick, the other is using the sched. But they both seem
to account the same thing: utime + stime.
Thanks.
Frederic Weisbecker (3):
posix_cpu_timers: Consolidate expiry time type
posix_cpu_timers: Consolidate timer list cleanups
posix_cpu_timers: Consolidate expired timers check
include/linux/posix-timers.h | 16 ++-
kernel/posix-cpu-timers.c | 387 +++++++++++++++---------------------------
2 files changed, 146 insertions(+), 257 deletions(-)
--
1.7.5.4
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists