[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87wqtmq6sb.wl%satoru.takeuchi@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 05 Mar 2013 23:07:32 +0900
From: Satoru Takeuchi <satoru.takeuchi@...il.com>
To: Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [ 000/153] 3.2.40-stable review
At Mon, 04 Mar 2013 03:37:07 +0000,
Ben Hutchings wrote:
>
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.2.40 release.
> There are 153 patches in this series, which will be posted as responses
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Wed Mar 6 02:00:00 UTC 2013.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> A combined patch relative to 3.2.39 will be posted as an additional
> response to this. A shortlog and diffstat can be found below.
This kernel can be built and boot without any problem.
Building a kernel with this kernel also works fine.
- Build Machine: debian wheezy x86_64
CPU: Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-2400 CPU @ 3.10GHz x 4
memory: 8GB
- Test machine: debian wheezy x86_64(KVM guest on the Build Machine)
vCPU: x2
memory: 2GB
I reviewed the following patches and it looks good to me.
> Matt Fleming (1):
> x86, efi: Make "noefi" really disable EFI runtime serivces
> [fb834c7acc5e140cf4f9e86da93a66de8c0514da]
...
> Satoru Takeuchi (1):
> efi: Clear EFI_RUNTIME_SERVICES rather than EFI_BOOT by "noefi" boot parameter
> [1de63d60cd5b0d33a812efa455d5933bf1564a51]
Thanks,
Satoru
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists