[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <51360D0D.5020609@hp.com>
Date: Tue, 05 Mar 2013 07:19:41 -0800
From: Chegu Vinod <chegu_vinod@...com>
To: Raghavendra K T <raghavendra.kt@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
CC: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Avi Kivity <avi.kivity@...il.com>,
Gleb Natapov <gleb@...hat.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@...hat.com>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
Srikar <srikar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
"Nikunj A. Dadhania" <nikunj@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
KVM <kvm@...r.kernel.org>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Jiannan Ouyang <ouyang@...pitt.edu>,
"Andrew M. Theurer" <habanero@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Srivatsa Vaddagiri <srivatsa.vaddagiri@...il.com>,
Andrew Jones <drjones@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 1/2] kvm: Record the preemption status of vcpus using
preempt notifiers
On 3/4/2013 10:02 AM, Raghavendra K T wrote:
> From: Raghavendra K T <raghavendra.kt@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
>
> Note that we mark as preempted only when vcpu's task state was
> Running during preemption.
>
> Thanks Jiannan, Avi for preemption notifier ideas. Thanks Gleb, PeterZ
> for their precious suggestions. Thanks Srikar for an idea on avoiding
> rcu lock while checking task state that improved overcommit numbers.
>
> Signed-off-by: Raghavendra K T <raghavendra.kt@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
> ---
> include/linux/kvm_host.h | 1 +
> virt/kvm/kvm_main.c | 5 +++++
> 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/kvm_host.h b/include/linux/kvm_host.h
> index cad77fe..0b31e1c 100644
> --- a/include/linux/kvm_host.h
> +++ b/include/linux/kvm_host.h
> @@ -252,6 +252,7 @@ struct kvm_vcpu {
> bool dy_eligible;
> } spin_loop;
> #endif
> + bool preempted;
> struct kvm_vcpu_arch arch;
> };
>
> diff --git a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
> index adc68fe..83a804c 100644
> --- a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
> +++ b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
> @@ -244,6 +244,7 @@ int kvm_vcpu_init(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm *kvm, unsigned id)
>
> kvm_vcpu_set_in_spin_loop(vcpu, false);
> kvm_vcpu_set_dy_eligible(vcpu, false);
> + vcpu->preempted = false;
>
> r = kvm_arch_vcpu_init(vcpu);
> if (r < 0)
> @@ -2902,6 +2903,8 @@ struct kvm_vcpu *preempt_notifier_to_vcpu(struct preempt_notifier *pn)
> static void kvm_sched_in(struct preempt_notifier *pn, int cpu)
> {
> struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu = preempt_notifier_to_vcpu(pn);
> + if (vcpu->preempted)
> + vcpu->preempted = false;
>
> kvm_arch_vcpu_load(vcpu, cpu);
> }
> @@ -2911,6 +2914,8 @@ static void kvm_sched_out(struct preempt_notifier *pn,
> {
> struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu = preempt_notifier_to_vcpu(pn);
>
> + if (current->state == TASK_RUNNING)
> + vcpu->preempted = true;
> kvm_arch_vcpu_put(vcpu);
> }
>
>
> .
>
Reviewed-by: Chegu Vinod <chegu_vinod@...com>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists