[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20130305.145719.1469904264539814585.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Tue, 05 Mar 2013 14:57:19 -0500 (EST)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: eliezer.tamir@...ux.intel.com
Cc: bhutchings@...arflare.com, eliezer.tamir@...ux.jf.intel.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
jesse.brandeburg@...el.com, e1000-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
willemb@...gle.com, andi@...stfloor.org, hpa@...or.com,
eliezer@...ir.org.il
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/5] net: implement support for low latency socket
polling
From: Eliezer Tamir <eliezer.tamir@...ux.intel.com>
Date: Tue, 05 Mar 2013 19:15:26 +0200
> We are not very sensitive to this setting, anything on the order of
> your half round time trip plus a few standard deviations works well.
> We are busy waiting, so setting a higher value does not change the
> results much.
This makes the argument for using sched_clock() even stronger.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists