| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <513662E8.3040500@candelatech.com>
Date: Tue, 05 Mar 2013 13:26:00 -0800
From: Ben Greear <greearb@...delatech.com>
To: Jeff Layton <jlayton@...hat.com>
CC: linux-cifs@...r.kernel.org,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: 3.7.10+: BUG Dentry still in use [unmount of cifs cifs]
On 03/05/2013 01:09 PM, Jeff Layton wrote:
> On Tue, 05 Mar 2013 11:42:46 -0800
> Ben Greear <greearb@...delatech.com> wrote:
>
>> On 03/05/2013 11:22 AM, Jeff Layton wrote:
>>> On Tue, 5 Mar 2013 14:08:49 -0500
>>> Jeff Layton <jlayton@...hat.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Tue, 05 Mar 2013 10:54:56 -0800
>>>> Ben Greear <greearb@...delatech.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> In doing some CIFS testing (utilizing it's feature to bind to local
>>>>> address..but not sure that matters), we saw this error when trying
>>>>> to un-mount.
>>>>>
>>>>> Our kernel is patched (nfs, some networking related patches), but there
>>>>> are no out-of-kernel patches to CIFS, so I don't *think* this is anything
>>>>> we could have caused.
>>>>>
>>>>> This problem appears to be easily reproducible, so we will be happy
>>>>> to test patches if anyone has any suggestions.
>>>>>
>>>>> BUG: Dentry ffff8800c07e43c0{i=45762,n=cifs2-01.7.lf-data} still in use (1) [unmount of cifs cifs]
>>>>> ------------[ cut here ]------------
>>>>> kernel BUG at /home/greearb/git/linux-3.7.dev.y/fs/dcache.c:967!
>>>>> invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP
>>>>> Modules linked in: nls_utf8 cifs 8021q garp stp llc iptable_raw xt_CT veth nf_nat_ipv4 nf_nat fuse macvlan wanlink(O) pktgen nfsv3 nfs_acl nfsv4 auth_rpcgss nfs
>>>>> fscache lockd sunrpc be2iscsi iscsi_boot_sysfs bnx2i cnic uio cxgb4i cxgb4 cxgb3i cxgb3 mdio libcxgbi ib_iser rdma_cm ib_addr iw_cm ib_cm ib_sa ib_mad ib_core
>>>>> w83793 iscsi_tcp w83627hf libiscsi_tcp hwmon_vid libiscsi scsi_transport_iscsi coretemp mperf kvm_intel kvm i5k_amb uinput i5000_edac gpio_ich edac_core
>>>>> iTCO_wdt e1000e iTCO_vendor_support lpc_ich i2c_i801 pcspkr ioatdma dca microcode shpchp ipv6 floppy radeon i2c_algo_bit hwmon drm_kms_helper ttm drm i2c_core
>>>>> [last unloaded: iptable_nat]
>>>>> CPU 6
>>>>> Pid: 6610, comm: umount Tainted: G C O 3.7.10+ #74 Supermicro X7DBU/X7DBU
>>>>> RIP: 0010:[<ffffffff811591c9>] [<ffffffff811591c9>] shrink_dcache_for_umount_subtree+0x84/0x194
>>>>> RSP: 0018:ffff8800c0085dc8 EFLAGS: 00010296
>>>>> RAX: 0000000000000062 RBX: ffff8800c07e43c0 RCX: 0000000000000059
>>>>> RDX: ffffffff81bc25a8 RSI: 0000000000000046 RDI: 0000000000000246
>>>>> RBP: ffff8800c0085de8 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: ffff8800c0085cc8
>>>>> R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: ffff8800c050e9c0
>>>>> R13: ffff880128ee8000 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: ffff8800c0085f28
>>>>> FS: 00007f6084847840(0000) GS:ffff88012fd80000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
>>>>> CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 000000008005003b
>>>>> CR2: 00007f608442c3a0 CR3: 00000000c7c2d000 CR4: 00000000000007e0
>>>>> DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
>>>>> DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000ffff0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
>>>>> Process umount (pid: 6610, threadinfo ffff8800c0084000, task ffff88012a6a0000)
>>>>> Stack:
>>>>> ffff880128ee8310 00000000000128c0 ffff880128ee8000 ffffffffa06b96b0
>>>>> ffff8800c0085e08 ffffffff81159310 ffff8800c0084000 ffff880128ee8000
>>>>> ffff8800c0085e38 ffffffff81149afe ffff8800c0085e38 0000000000000021
>>>>> Call Trace:
>>>>> [<ffffffff81159310>] shrink_dcache_for_umount+0x37/0x49
>>>>> [<ffffffff81149afe>] generic_shutdown_super+0x20/0xd2
>>>>> [<ffffffff81149c25>] kill_anon_super+0x11/0x1c
>>>>> [<ffffffffa068b1ea>] cifs_kill_sb+0x15/0x21 [cifs]
>>>>> [<ffffffff81149e48>] deactivate_locked_super+0x32/0x5e
>>>>> [<ffffffff8114a942>] deactivate_super+0x40/0x46
>>>>> [<ffffffff8115fdb3>] mntput_no_expire+0x12d/0x136
>>>>> [<ffffffff81160b59>] sys_umount+0x321/0x34c
>>>>> [<ffffffff8114f846>] ? path_put+0x1d/0x21
>>>>> [<ffffffff81525229>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
>>>>> Code: 50 28 4c 8b 0a 31 d2 48 85 f6 74 04 48 8b 56 40 48 05 10 03 00 00 48 89 de 48 c7 c7 9d d0 7b 81 48 89 04 24 31 c0 e8 b9 4e 3c 00 <0f> 0b eb fe 4c 8b 63 18
>>>>> 4c 39 e3 75 3c 48 8b 93 90 00 00 00 48
>>>>> RIP [<ffffffff811591c9>] shrink_dcache_for_umount_subtree+0x84/0x194
>>>>> RSP <ffff8800c0085dc8>
>>>>> ---[ end trace 9b2978a89532c292 ]---
>>>>
>>>> Hmmm...dentry leak. Are there any jobs queued to the cifsiod workqueue
>>>> when the box oopses?
>>>>
>>>
>>> In fact...
>>>
>>> It's just a guess, but does this patch help at all? Note that it builds
>>> but is otherwise untested ;). If it works we might want to go with
>>> something a bit less invasive but this may tell us if we're on the
>>> right track.
>>
>> This does not fix the problem, though possibly it is still
>> a correct fix for some other bug. Some more details on this test case:
>>
>> We create 8 writer processes (which do one mount per thread), write some files.
>>
>> Then, stop those, and un-mount.
>>
>> Then, start 8 reader processes, which will create 8 mounts and then start
>> reading data.
>>
>> Finally, stop these readers, which will stop the read IO calls and immediately
>> try to un-mount the the 8 mounts. These unmount attempts cause the bug.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Ben
>>
>>
>
> Ok, thanks...it was worth a shot. I guess we'll have to track this down
> the hard way then and try to figure out where the dentry leak is coming
> from.
>
> My guess would be that it's coming from the async read code path
> somewhere. When you stop the processes doing the reading, how do you do
> it? Are they sent a signal?
It should be a clean stop (process: receives command over tcp socket asking for stop,
closes sockets, calls script to unmount, exit).
We can work on trying to reproduce this with a less complicated
framework, but might be tomorrow before we can get on that.
Thanks,
Ben
--
Ben Greear <greearb@...delatech.com>
Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists