| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20130305031701.GN16362@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Tue, 5 Mar 2013 11:17:01 +0800
From: Hu Tao <hutao@...fujitsu.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
Cc: kvm list <kvm@...r.kernel.org>, qemu-devel <qemu-devel@...gnu.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Daniel P. Berrange" <berrange@...hat.com>,
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>,
Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@...mens.com>,
Gleb Natapov <gleb@...hat.com>,
Blue Swirl <blauwirbel@...il.com>,
Eric Blake <eblake@...hat.com>,
Andrew Jones <drjones@...hat.com>,
Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@...hat.com>,
Sasha Levin <levinsasha928@...il.com>,
Luiz Capitulino <lcapitulino@...hat.com>,
Anthony Liguori <aliguori@...ibm.com>,
Markus Armbruster <armbru@...hat.com>,
Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@...hat.com>,
Juan Quintela <quintela@...hat.com>,
Orit Wasserman <owasserm@...hat.com>,
Kevin Wolf <kwolf@...hat.com>,
Wen Congyang <wency@...fujitsu.com>,
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>,
Alexander Graf <agraf@...e.de>,
Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@...hat.com>,
Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v13 4/8] add a new runstate: RUN_STATE_GUEST_PANICKED
On Mon, Mar 04, 2013 at 10:40:15AM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> Il 28/02/2013 13:13, Hu Tao ha scritto:
> > The guest will be in this state when it is panicked.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Wen Congyang <wency@...fujitsu.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Hu Tao <hutao@...fujitsu.com>
> > ---
> > migration.c | 1 +
> > qapi-schema.json | 6 +++++-
> > qmp.c | 3 ++-
> > vl.c | 11 ++++++++++-
> > 4 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/migration.c b/migration.c
> > index c29830e..fa17b82 100644
> > --- a/migration.c
> > +++ b/migration.c
> > @@ -698,6 +698,7 @@ static void *buffered_file_thread(void *opaque)
> > int64_t start_time, end_time;
> >
> > DPRINTF("done iterating\n");
> > + save_run_state();
> > start_time = qemu_get_clock_ms(rt_clock);
> > qemu_system_wakeup_request(QEMU_WAKEUP_REASON_OTHER);
> > if (old_vm_running) {
> > diff --git a/qapi-schema.json b/qapi-schema.json
> > index 28b070f..8f1d138 100644
> > --- a/qapi-schema.json
> > +++ b/qapi-schema.json
> > @@ -174,11 +174,15 @@
> > # @suspended: guest is suspended (ACPI S3)
> > #
> > # @watchdog: the watchdog action is configured to pause and has been triggered
> > +#
> > +# @guest-panicked: the panicked action is configured to pause and has been
> > +# triggered.
> > ##
> > { 'enum': 'RunState',
> > 'data': [ 'debug', 'inmigrate', 'internal-error', 'io-error', 'paused',
> > 'postmigrate', 'prelaunch', 'finish-migrate', 'restore-vm',
> > - 'running', 'save-vm', 'shutdown', 'suspended', 'watchdog' ] }
> > + 'running', 'save-vm', 'shutdown', 'suspended', 'watchdog',
> > + 'guest-panicked' ] }
> >
> > ##
> > # @SnapshotInfo
> > diff --git a/qmp.c b/qmp.c
> > index 5f1bed1..f5027f6 100644
> > --- a/qmp.c
> > +++ b/qmp.c
> > @@ -150,7 +150,8 @@ void qmp_cont(Error **errp)
> > Error *local_err = NULL;
> >
> > if (runstate_check(RUN_STATE_INTERNAL_ERROR) ||
> > - runstate_check(RUN_STATE_SHUTDOWN)) {
> > + runstate_check(RUN_STATE_SHUTDOWN) ||
> > + runstate_check(RUN_STATE_GUEST_PANICKED)) {
> > error_set(errp, QERR_RESET_REQUIRED);
> > return;
> > } else if (runstate_check(RUN_STATE_SUSPENDED)) {
> > diff --git a/vl.c b/vl.c
> > index 3d08e1a..51d4922 100644
> > --- a/vl.c
> > +++ b/vl.c
> > @@ -536,6 +536,7 @@ static const RunStateTransition runstate_transitions_def[] = {
> >
> > { RUN_STATE_INMIGRATE, RUN_STATE_RUNNING },
> > { RUN_STATE_INMIGRATE, RUN_STATE_PAUSED },
> > + { RUN_STATE_INMIGRATE, RUN_STATE_GUEST_PANICKED },
>
> Is this a consequence of the first patch?
Yes.
>
> > { RUN_STATE_INTERNAL_ERROR, RUN_STATE_RUNNING },
> > { RUN_STATE_INTERNAL_ERROR, RUN_STATE_FINISH_MIGRATE },
> > @@ -549,6 +550,7 @@ static const RunStateTransition runstate_transitions_def[] = {
> > { RUN_STATE_POSTMIGRATE, RUN_STATE_RUNNING },
> > { RUN_STATE_POSTMIGRATE, RUN_STATE_PAUSED },
> > { RUN_STATE_POSTMIGRATE, RUN_STATE_FINISH_MIGRATE },
> > + { RUN_STATE_POSTMIGRATE, RUN_STATE_GUEST_PANICKED },
>
> Impossible. GUEST_PANICKED requires an instruction to be executed in
> the guest, so it should first go to RUNNING.
>
> > { RUN_STATE_PRELAUNCH, RUN_STATE_RUNNING },
> > { RUN_STATE_PRELAUNCH, RUN_STATE_FINISH_MIGRATE },
> > @@ -559,6 +561,7 @@ static const RunStateTransition runstate_transitions_def[] = {
> >
> > { RUN_STATE_RESTORE_VM, RUN_STATE_RUNNING },
> > { RUN_STATE_RESTORE_VM, RUN_STATE_PAUSED },
> > + { RUN_STATE_RESTORE_VM, RUN_STATE_GUEST_PANICKED },
>
> Is it also for the first patch?
Yes.
>
> > { RUN_STATE_RUNNING, RUN_STATE_DEBUG },
> > { RUN_STATE_RUNNING, RUN_STATE_INTERNAL_ERROR },
> > @@ -569,6 +572,7 @@ static const RunStateTransition runstate_transitions_def[] = {
> > { RUN_STATE_RUNNING, RUN_STATE_SAVE_VM },
> > { RUN_STATE_RUNNING, RUN_STATE_SHUTDOWN },
> > { RUN_STATE_RUNNING, RUN_STATE_WATCHDOG },
> > + { RUN_STATE_RUNNING, RUN_STATE_GUEST_PANICKED },
>
> This one is obviously ok.
>
> > { RUN_STATE_SAVE_VM, RUN_STATE_RUNNING },
> >
> > @@ -583,6 +587,10 @@ static const RunStateTransition runstate_transitions_def[] = {
> > { RUN_STATE_WATCHDOG, RUN_STATE_RUNNING },
> > { RUN_STATE_WATCHDOG, RUN_STATE_FINISH_MIGRATE },
> >
> > + { RUN_STATE_GUEST_PANICKED, RUN_STATE_RUNNING },
> > + { RUN_STATE_GUEST_PANICKED, RUN_STATE_PAUSED },
> > + { RUN_STATE_GUEST_PANICKED, RUN_STATE_FINISH_MIGRATE },
>
> Like SHUTDOWN, it should go first to PAUSED and then to RUNNING. A
> GUEST_PANICKED -> RUNNING transition is not possible. You're seeing it
> because you lack the addition of GUEST_PANICKED here:
>
> if (runstate_check(RUN_STATE_INTERNAL_ERROR) ||
> runstate_check(RUN_STATE_SHUTDOWN)) {
> runstate_set(RUN_STATE_PAUSED);
> }
>
> I think you should first move the INTERNAL_ERROR || SHUTDOWN checks to a
> separate function, so that you can then add GUEST_PANICKED.
Will
if (runstate_check(RUN_STATE_INTERNAL_ERROR) ||
runstate_check(RUN_STATE_SHUTDOWN) ||
runstate_check(RUN_STATE_GUEST_PANICKED)) {
runstate_set(RUN_STATE_PAUSED);
}
be OK? Or I must be misunderstanding you.
>
> Paolo
>
> > { RUN_STATE_MAX, RUN_STATE_MAX },
> > };
> >
> > @@ -2001,7 +2009,8 @@ static bool main_loop_should_exit(void)
> > qemu_system_reset(VMRESET_REPORT);
> > resume_all_vcpus();
> > if (runstate_check(RUN_STATE_INTERNAL_ERROR) ||
> > - runstate_check(RUN_STATE_SHUTDOWN)) {
> > + runstate_check(RUN_STATE_SHUTDOWN) ||
> > + runstate_check(RUN_STATE_GUEST_PANICKED)) {
> > bdrv_iterate(iostatus_bdrv_it, NULL);
> > vm_start();
> > }
> >
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists